MicroProfile Config 2.0 Specification Review

[Emily-Jiang]

Specification issue template

When creating a specification project release review, create an issue in the MicroProfile-WG repository repo with the content defined as follows.

• Specification name and version
• Add the label Release Review
• Naming conventions for artifacts:
  • Specification PDF in the form of microprofile-project-spec-version.pdf
  • Specification HTML in the form of microprofile-project-spec-version.html
  • project is the microprofile specification short project name (config, health, ...)
  • version is the two digit x.y version of the specification

• The Nexus Staging links (orgeclipsemicroprofile-NNNN where NNNN is the staging repository id) (eg, https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgeclipsemicroprofile-NNNN/org/eclipse/microprofile/config/) which contain all the binaries and relevant documentation:
  • Staging Repo
  • Spec PDF
  • Spec HTML
  • Javadoc
  • API Jar
  • TCK Jar

• A link in the Eclipse downloads sections is still available for specs and apidocs:
  • https://download.eclipse.org/microprofile/staging/microprofile-config-2.0/
  • An apidocs directory containing the javadoc associated with the API jar.

• Summary that a Compatible Implementation is complete, passes the TCK, and that the TCK includes sufficient coverage of the specification:
  • Compatible Certification Request

• Release Review
  • Follow governance process and create/update release record
    • Component Release Record
  • Email to PMC
  • Start release review by emailing EMO (Track the bug issue created by EMO after the email)
  • send microprofile-wg for voting

[radcortez]

+1

[radcortez]

/cc @jclingan @ederks85 @emecas

[Emily-Jiang]

Received +1 from PMC

Gunnar Wagenknecht gunnar@wagenknecht.org via eclipse.org | Gunnar Wagenknecht gunnar@wagenknecht.org via eclipse.org | Wed, Nov 18, 7:00 PM (1 day ago)
+1
Gunnar Wagenknecht gunnar@wagenknecht.org via eclipse.org

[Emily-Jiang]

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=568938

[radcortez]

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=568938

Can you add the link into the description, so it gets more visibility?

[kwsutter]

+1
I have reviewed the materials for this Config 2.0 release and all looks good. I will initiate the ballot review shortly.

[jclingan]

+1

[aeiras]

We forgot to include the final step, the Result Ballot notification after the initiated ballot is sent.
can you add the step to Metrics? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wISp-yRzQZNOHULNekxxg1U18be3v-3CRUswklcpmr8/edit

Thank YOU! the general template needs to be adjusted as well. :)

[TetianaFTV]

+1 for Jelastic