-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
Closed
Labels
DuplicateAn existing issue was already createdAn existing issue was already created
Description
Like we can narrow down union types with typeof and instance of, it would be nice if it could also be narrowed with the javascript in operator.
Code
type Message1 = { name: "foo"};
type Message2 = { name: "personAdded", personId: string, fullName: string};
type Message3 = { name: "personSelected", personId?: string };
type AnyMessage = Message1 | Message2 | Message3;
function handleMessage(message: AnyMessage) {
// message can be: Message1 | Message2 | Message3
if ("personId" in message) {
// narrowed to: Message2 | Message3
switch (message.name) {
case "personAdded": console.log(`Person added: ${message.fullName}`); break;
case "personSelected": console.log("Person selection changed"); break;
default: exhaustiveFail(message); break; // error: Message1 is not handled
}
}
};
function exhaustiveFail(x: never): never {
throw new Error(`Unexpected object: ${x}`);
}When using an exhaustive switch/if, it would allow us to reduce the union type down to only the types that can have the specified property.
Remark
What to do with numbers and symbols?
const a = ["foo", 42];
if (0 in a) {...}
if (Symbol.iterator in a) {...}Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
DuplicateAn existing issue was already createdAn existing issue was already created