Skip to content

Conversation

@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member

@jeffhandley jeffhandley commented Oct 28, 2025

Motivation and Context

While configuring my machine to get nightly builds, I noticed an inconsistency in the FAQ for configuring the GitHub package source.

Description

Updates the NuGet.config illustrated to use the same package source name referenced in the powershell statement.

Contribution Checklist

  • The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • The PR follows the Contribution Guidelines
  • All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
  • Is this a breaking change? If yes, add "[BREAKING]" prefix to the title of the PR.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 28, 2025 18:13
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the NuGet configuration example in the FAQ documentation to use a more descriptive package source key name. The change improves consistency with the command-line example shown earlier in the same section.

  • Renames the package source key from "github" to "GitHubMicrosoft" throughout the NuGet.Config XML example
  • Improves XML indentation consistency in the packageSourceCredentials section
  • Ensures the manual configuration example matches the dotnet nuget add source command which already uses the GitHubMicrosoft name

@stephentoub stephentoub added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit b374ff0 Nov 6, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants