Skip to content

Conversation

@leplatrem
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #103

@leplatrem leplatrem requested a review from a team as a code owner July 13, 2022 13:53
Copy link
Contributor

@grahamalama grahamalama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we actually run the app this way in any context? Should we document this and/or add a command to the Makefile? Or maybe we don't even need this __main__ way to run the app 🤔

@leplatrem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Or maybe we don't even need this main way to run the app

I agree, but I was stuck with #107 and could not run the app locally

@leplatrem leplatrem merged commit 0d793c9 into main Jul 14, 2022
@leplatrem leplatrem deleted the 103-local-uvicorn branch July 14, 2022 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

python -m src.app.api fails to run

3 participants