Skip to content

Conversation

@uhm0311
Copy link
Collaborator

@uhm0311 uhm0311 commented Dec 19, 2023

#699

위 PR과 같은 이유 + TranscoderService를 제외하는 것이 ArcusClient 클래스의 reactiveAsyncGet() 구현이 더욱 간단해지기 때문에 리팩토링 했습니다.

@uhm0311 uhm0311 self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@jhpark816 jhpark816 requested review from oliviarla and removed request for jhpark816 May 9, 2025 01:53
@jhpark816
Copy link
Collaborator

@oliviarla @brido4125
리뷰 바랍니다.

@oliviarla
Copy link
Collaborator

이 PR을 리뷰하는 목적이 무엇인가요?
이 브랜치의 목적이 단순히 PoC 를 위함인가요?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants