Preparation for upgrading to the forthcoming openssl-1.0.1m

[shigeki]

OpenSSL-1.0.1m is to be released on March 19 which fixes vulnerabilities of high severity. For quick release of iojs, I've just made a branch of upgrading it to the current HEAD of OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable branch in https://github.com/shigeki/io.js/tree/WIP_OpenSSL_1_0_1m .

After extracting all sources of the current HEAD of OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable in 879c4c3 , the following 5 commits are needed.

14a7f46 deps: replace all headers in openssl
f46274e deps: separate sha256/sha512-x86_64.pl for openssl
3d8b231 deps: fix openssl assembly error on ia32 win32
206b3f0 deps: remove vpaesni-x86_64.asm in x64-win32-masm
1efcfd5 openssl: fix keypress requirement in apps on win32

The forthcoming release would not be so much changed from the current HEAD so these commits can easily be cherry-picked.
I also checked asm files are not changed with asm/Makefile. CI results of https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/322/ are fine with known test failures except the one of test-signal-unregister on Ubuntu10.01 but I think it's not related with this upgrade.

@bnoordhuis @indutny Could you please review the above five commits for preparation?

[Fishrock123]

I don't see that test failure anywhere else though..

[bnoordhuis]

14a7f46 is c4b9be7 redux, I think? What about f46274e? Was sha256-x86_64.pl added by @indutny in 508a6c2?

LGTM though. No comments, just some questions.

[indutny]

Yeah, I think I already did sha256-x86_64.pl thing. Otherwise LGTM

[indutny]

Thanks for you work!

[rvagg]

Agreed in TC meeting today that we'll hold up 1.6.0 for this and that we should release asap after this is merged.

[shigeki]

Thanks for reviews and test check. The release will be between 11:00-15:00 GMT today. I will work it as soon as it is available.

[rvagg]

that window starts at 10pm for me, so I may be up, otherwise it'll have to wait for @chrisdickinson to wake up and finish off a release

[shigeki]

I will write down my progress here. If not, I give it over to @bnoordhuis or @indutny .

[jbergstroem]

While looking through this I found deps/openssl/asm/x64-win32-masm/x86_64cpuid.asm.orig. Guessing this file was checked in by mistake (commit 5edbb53)?

[shigeki]

Good catch! I missed to find it. I will update the commits to remove it.

[shigeki]

Added in b2a214b. Also reverting 8b2363d was deleted and it was force pushed to my branch.