Skip to content

Conversation

mhdawson
Copy link
Member

The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail. Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

doc

The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Apr 19, 2017
@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Apr 19, 2017
be required. In this case try:

```text
$ curl -L https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/xxx.patch | git am --3way --whitespace=fix
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe shorten to just -3?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pushed commit to change to -3

Copy link
Member

@benjamingr benjamingr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, also this could have saved me time when I started :)

@mscdex mscdex added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Apr 19, 2017
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 20, 2017

There is an "If git am fails" section of onboarding_extras.md that includes this suggestion. To avoid duplication, it might be a good idea to review the rest of that (short) section to see if anything else should be included here, and then remove it from onboarding_extras.md. (That file seems like largely a hodge-podge anyway and the contents should probably be moved to more logical places like this.)

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott pushed commit to address comments.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

CI good, landed as 1159a71

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Apr 21, 2017
mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
@evanlucas evanlucas mentioned this pull request May 1, 2017
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: #12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request May 23, 2017
@mhdawson mhdawson deleted the collabg branch June 28, 2017 19:24
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
The CI seems to do a 3way merge so it is possible
that even though the CI passed, the existing git am command
may fail.  Add text to suggest how to handle this
by adding the --3way option.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#12510
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants