-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.4k
repl: better REPL commands detection #2254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the parse regex is far too lenient to begin with, and that we could probably only use one regex. Furthermore, why don't we just put this within
if (!wasWithinStrLiteral && !isWithinStrLiteral) {
above? That way we can catch it before anything is trimmed.I'm suggesting something like:
as an aside, we should probably just check before everything if
(\^\s*$\.test(cmd))
(or(cmd.trim() === ''
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/^\.[a-z-_]+\s*[^(){}[];=|&]*$/
doesn't allow file names with the special characters^(){}[];=|&
. I can live that. Also_
and-
are not necessary in it, because the REPL commands don't have them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The defaults don't currently, correct. But they could eventually. Also I think the repl can be extended to add more commands? If so, those characters seem like likely candidates to exist in a custom command. While we are at it we should add
A-Z
to the match too.Given the above, it's possible this would technically be a breaking change then? I'm not so sure, or concerned either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, looks like this would be very tricky to fix and will still break from time to time :'(