Skip to content

Conversation

BeniCheni
Copy link
Contributor

@BeniCheni BeniCheni commented Mar 16, 2019

Refs #26546

Reduce internal usage of public require of util in the scope of stream.

  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem. label Mar 16, 2019
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 17, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
PR-URL: nodejs#26698
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in c97851d 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Mar 21, 2019
@BeniCheni BeniCheni deleted the remove-internal-require-stream branch March 21, 2019 23:59
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
PR-URL: nodejs#26698
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
PR-URL: #26698
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented May 26, 2019

Why @nodejs/streams was not tagged on this one? I would have opposed this change landing.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Sep 6, 2019

Yes, this should not have happened, see nodejs/readable-stream#416 (comment). I’ll open a revert PR for the streams parts.

addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2019
…util"

This partially reverts commit c97851d.

Streams code should ideally require on public APIs as much as possible,
because it is exported as readable-stream.

Refs: nodejs#26698
Refs: nodejs/readable-stream#416
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants