Skip to content

Conversation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Aug 16, 2020

In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Aug 16, 2020
@Trott Trott added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 16, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 16, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 18, 2020

Landed in aa5361c

Trott added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2020
In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

PR-URL: #34793
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@Trott Trott closed this Aug 18, 2020
@Trott Trott deleted the assert-fail2 branch August 18, 2020 05:10
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

PR-URL: #34793
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

PR-URL: #34793
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

PR-URL: #34793
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
In test-http-destroyed-socket-write2, the assert.strictEqual() in the
default case of the switch statement will always fail because it checks
for a value that is already accounted for in one of the switch cases.
Convert it to assert.fail().

PR-URL: #34793
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants