Test PR: @lbillinghamwrk wants to see the diff #33
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: bagashvilit <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: WonjoonC <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Isac Souza <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Isac Souza <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liuyang Wan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Aleksei Fedotov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liuyang Wan <[email protected]>
…pt`), remove deprecated `unicode` type (PyGithub#2273)
* chore(dependency): flake8 has moved to github * feat: add allow_forking to Repository * chore: linting Co-authored-by: hussaiia <[email protected]>
* A property to access the `assets` field of release (PyGithub#1898) ... in order to avoid extra requests. <PyGithub#1898> * Remove comment to comply the review * Add tests for GitRelease.assets --------- Co-authored-by: green-green-avk <[email protected]>
* Support full GitHub app authentication Refactor GithubIntegration class and add test case for app authentication Add permissions and repository properties in InstallationAuthorization Set JWT_EXPIRY=60 by default in GithubIntegration constructor * Modify existing testcases for GithubIntegration as per the framework and add missing tests * Provide installation ID for creating the access token instead of getting the first installation * Add optional permissions support for installation access token * Add lock around app authentication * Keep compatibility for importing GithubIntegration from MainClass * Group app authentication parameters in a class Co-authored-by: Malik Ammar Akbar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Enrico Minack <[email protected]>
Pass requester base URL to integration (PyGithub#2420)
…hub#2443) * Add crypto extras to pyjwt, which pulls in cryptogaphy package * Remove cryptography dependency from more places * Remove integrations extra from docs
…b#2439) * Add expiration argument back to create_jwt
…tation In PyGithub#1290 we changed the verbs in the methods for `def .*_{user,team}_push_restrictions` from `edit` to `replace` It looks like we missed that change to the method implimentation in the typestubs. This PR re-synchronizes them. implimentations at https://github.com/PyGithub/PyGithub/blame/master/github/Branch.py#L439 and https://github.com/PyGithub/PyGithub/blame/master/github/Branch.py#L472 (as far as I can tell, the pyi stub files didn't exist at time of PyGithub#1290
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
16 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Between what gets run in
optile/ghconf-runnerand what is specified inoptile/ghconf-optile.I suspect that we only want b2840b9 to be brought into
optile/PyGitHub/branches/optile-headPart of PLATFORM-983