-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 19.2k
REF: support reso in remaining tslibs helpers #48661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -75,11 +75,13 @@ cdef bint cmp_scalar(int64_t lhs, int64_t rhs, int op) except -1 | |
|
|
||
| cdef check_dts_bounds(npy_datetimestruct *dts, NPY_DATETIMEUNIT unit=?) | ||
|
|
||
| cdef int64_t dtstruct_to_dt64(npy_datetimestruct* dts) nogil | ||
|
|
||
| cdef int64_t pydatetime_to_dt64(datetime val, npy_datetimestruct *dts) | ||
| cdef int64_t pydatetime_to_dt64( | ||
| datetime val, npy_datetimestruct *dts, NPY_DATETIMEUNIT reso=? | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No defaulting There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we'll soon need to be explicit everywhere this is called anyway |
||
| ) | ||
| cdef void pydatetime_to_dtstruct(datetime dt, npy_datetimestruct *dts) | ||
| cdef int64_t pydate_to_dt64(date val, npy_datetimestruct *dts) | ||
| cdef int64_t pydate_to_dt64( | ||
| date val, npy_datetimestruct *dts, NPY_DATETIMEUNIT reso=? | ||
| ) | ||
| cdef void pydate_to_dtstruct(date val, npy_datetimestruct *dts) | ||
|
|
||
| cdef npy_datetime get_datetime64_value(object obj) nogil | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW: It looks like this entire function is just unit tested and not used anywhere else so could be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yah, i always figured it was really a test for string_to_dts, would be OK with declaring we already have enough indirect tests of that