This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Reject too large transactions #558
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b622f09
Fix is_valid condition when removing transactions from the pool.
tomusdrw 8c34f5a
Less verbosity.
tomusdrw 1e8b0ef
Reject too large transctions from the pool.
tomusdrw b096c1b
Bring back the warning level.
tomusdrw d48fdba
Fix link.
tomusdrw File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I follow this one. Why is it inverted here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
transaction-poolAPI expects an inverted bool (is_invalid) - that was a bug that was causing the transactions to be logged as "canceled" instead of "invalid"Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, maybe we should rename it then, since it's presently named
is_valid? This is actually where my confusion comes from : )https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/e89b8aa7e4ceb2b8f1348e027d61ebb9c820eec4/polkadot/transaction-pool/src/lib.rs#L389
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the composition looks like this:
The code in polkadot transaction pool is fine it uses
is_validand passes it further to extrinsics pool. Extrinsics pool uses the externaltransaction-pool(take from ethereum/parity) and that one is usingis_invalid(https://docs.rs/transaction-pool/1.12.1/transaction_pool/struct.Pool.html#method.remove) hence the inversion here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can see it now! I mistakingly assumed that
transaction_pool as txpoolrefers topolkadot-transaction-pool