Support for Parse Schema #489
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #489 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.03% 84.57% +0.53%
==========================================
Files 47 48 +1
Lines 3795 3947 +152
Branches 868 895 +27
==========================================
+ Hits 3189 3338 +149
- Misses 606 609 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| _indexes: { [key: string]: mixed }; | ||
|
|
||
| constructor(className: ?string) { | ||
| if (typeof className === 'string') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we get jsdocs in all methods please? :)
|
@dplewis, have a look at the overhaul I had to do for the docs to be compatible with JSDoc 3.0. That will help so I don’t have to re-do it :p |
|
@flovilmart I'll add the documentation. |
|
Yes all good, I'll bump travis in my PR too :) |
|
@flovilmart I always wondered are these tests still used? |
|
Yes they are, those are the jest tests :( |
|
But they don’t report coverage, each file is unit tested by Jest, integration tests are run later and don’t produce coverage reports. |
|
@flovilmart Can you look this over? |
|
Looking great man! |
2 participants
Pending: parse-community/parse-server#4240
Adds CRUD support for new Parse.Schema class.