ticdc: clarify descriptions of index-value and columns
#21616
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hfxsd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request improves the clarity of the TiCDC documentation by refining the description of the index-value partition dispatcher within the Kafka sink configuration. The change specifically adds crucial information to ensure users understand that this dispatcher guarantees ordered delivery of row updates to the same partition, which is vital for data consistency.
Highlights
- Documentation Clarity: Enhanced the description of the
index-valuepartition dispatcher in the TiCDC Kafka sink documentation to explicitly state that it ensures ordered delivery of row updates to the same partition.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
missing-translation-status
hfxsd
added
translation/from-docs-cn
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request clarifies the behavior of the index-value partition dispatcher in TiCDC. The added description is helpful, but the wording could be improved for better clarity and grammatical correctness. I've suggested a rephrasing to make the guarantee about row update ordering more explicit and easier to understand.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
@3AceShowHand: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
hfxsd
changed the title
index-valueindex-value and columns
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
…auto-embed * commit 'b570cc86270ba2e2b2b71d6eab8d717c2c8a1c56': (48 commits) *: remove TiDB roadmap from TOC, home, index, add warning (#21628) (#21637) Update the scope of system-variable ”tidb_redact_log“ (#21513) (#21634) *: add custom Japanese localization for cloud docs (#21612) Modify the introduction of `cop_pool_size` (#21462) (#21627) tiflash: Update tiflash upgrade guide (#21619) (#21625) Update tidb-performance-tuning-config.md (#21621) (#21624) Update tidb-cloud-poc.md (#21336) (#21411) cloud: update the pricing link for starter (#21620) ticdc: clarify descriptions of `index-value` and `columns` (#21616) (#21617) release-8.5: remove 'v' prefix from tidb-version variable (#21614) release-8.5: update version to 8.5.3 (#21613) cloud: fix note annotation syntax for proper rendering (#21611) ticdc: add key word for redo log (#21564) (#21607) ticdc: correct the tiup cluster command (#21135) (#21608) bump TiDB from v8.5.2 to v8.5.3 (#21578) v8.5.3: add release notes (#21399) (#21606) v8.5.3: log backup: update metafile format (#21412) (#21577) v8.5.3: update telemetry related doc files (#21404) (#21603) system-variables: add optimizer cost factors (#20748) (#21602) Add more description about SHARD_ROW_ID_BITS (#21467) (#21600) ...
3 participants
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
index-valueandcolumnsdocs-cn#20791Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?