Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 29, 2022

Bumps vmactions/freebsd-vm from 0.2.0 to 0.2.2.

Release notes

Sourced from vmactions/freebsd-vm's releases.

Update Major release version

Please use the major release version v0 instead.

Just polish the output

Minor, Just polish the output

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [vmactions/freebsd-vm](https://github.com/vmactions/freebsd-vm) from 0.2.0 to 0.2.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/vmactions/freebsd-vm/releases)
- [Commits](vmactions/freebsd-vm@v0.2.0...v0.2.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: vmactions/freebsd-vm
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Jul 29, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 1, 2022

Superseded by #4.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Aug 1, 2022
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/vmactions/freebsd-vm-0.2.2 branch August 1, 2022 02:29
pizhenwei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2024
…is missed cases to redis-server. (redis#12322)

Observed that the sanitizer reported memory leak as clean up is not done
before the process termination in negative/following cases:

**- when we passed '--invalid' as option to redis-server.**

```
 -vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865778==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0985f65867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x558ec86686ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x558ec86686ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x558ec865dd7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x558ec87a1be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x558ec87a13b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x558ec85e6f15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7f09856e5d8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 8 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

```

**- when we pass '--port' as option and missed to add port number to redis-server.**

```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865846==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1f867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x557e8b04f6ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x557e8b044d7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Indirect leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1fc18 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164
    #1 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:287
    #2 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:317
    #3 0x557e8b04f9aa in zrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:342
    #4 0x557e8b033f90 in _sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:271
    #5 0x557e8b033f90 in sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:295
    #6 0x557e8b033f90 in sdscatlen /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:486
    #7 0x557e8b044e1f in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1165
    #8 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #9 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #10 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #11 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 18 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

```

As part analysis found that the sdsfreesplitres is not called when this condition checks are being hit.

Output after the fix:


```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$

===========================================
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --jdhg

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'jdhg'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments
```

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
pizhenwei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2024
## Issues and solutions from redis#12817
1. Touch ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked and calling moduleCount() without
GIL in afterSleep()
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.0.0
       PR: redis#9963

   - Harm Level: Very High
If the module thread calls `RM_Yield()` before the main thread enters
afterSleep(),
and modifies `ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked`(+1), it will cause the main
thread to not wait for GIL,
which can lead to all kinds of unforeseen problems, including memory
data corruption.

   - Initial / Abandoned Solution:
      * Added `__thread` specifier for ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked.
`ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked` is used to protect against nested event
processing, but event processing
in the main thread and module threads should be completely independent
and unaffected, so it is safer
         to use TLS.
* Adding a cached module count to keep track of the current number of
modules, to avoid having to use `dictSize()`.
    
    - Related Warnings:
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=1136)
  Write of size 4 at 0x0001045990c0 by thread T4 (mutexes: write M0):
    #0 processEventsWhileBlocked networking.c:4135 (redis-server:arm64+0x10006d124)
    #1 RM_Yield module.c:2410 (redis-server:arm64+0x10018b66c)
    #2 bg_call_worker <null>:83232836 (blockedclient.so:arm64+0x16a8)

  Previous read of size 4 at 0x0001045990c0 by main thread:
    #0 afterSleep server.c:1861 (redis-server:arm64+0x100024f98)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:408 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fd64)
    #2 aeMain ae.c:496 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010f0c)
    #3 main server.c:7220 (redis-server:arm64+0x10003f38c)
```

2. aeApiPoll() is not thread-safe
When using RM_Yield to handle events in a module thread, if the main
thread has not yet
entered `afterSleep()`, both the module thread and the main thread may
touch `server.el` at the same time.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.0.0
       PR: redis#9963

   - Old / Abandoned Solution:
Adding a new mutex to protect timing between after beforeSleep() and
before afterSleep().
Defect: If the main thread enters the ae loop without any IO events, it
will wait until
the next timeout or until there is any event again, and the module
thread will
always hang until the main thread leaves the event loop.

    - Related Warnings:
```
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race ae_kqueue.c:55 in addEventMask
==================
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=14682)
  Write of size 4 at 0x000100b54000 by thread T9 (mutexes: write M0):
    #0 aeApiPoll ae_kqueue.c:175 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010588)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:399 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fb84)
    #2 processEventsWhileBlocked networking.c:4138 (redis-server:arm64+0x10006d3c4)
    #3 RM_Yield module.c:2410 (redis-server:arm64+0x10018b66c)
    #4 bg_call_worker <null>:16042052 (blockedclient.so:arm64+0x169c)

  Previous write of size 4 at 0x000100b54000 by main thread:
    #0 aeApiPoll ae_kqueue.c:175 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010588)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:399 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fb84)
    #2 aeMain ae.c:496 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010da8)
    #3 main server.c:7238 (redis-server:arm64+0x10003f51c)
```

## The final fix as the comments:
redis#12817 (comment)
Optimized solution based on the above comment:

First, we add `module_gil_acquring` to indicate whether the main thread
is currently in the acquiring GIL state.

When the module thread starts to yield, there are two possibilities(we
assume the caller keeps the GIL):
1. The main thread is in the mid of beforeSleep() and afterSleep(), that
is, `module_gil_acquring` is not 1 now.
At this point, the module thread will wake up the main thread through
the pipe and leave the yield,
waiting for the next yield when the main thread may already in the
acquiring GIL state.
    
2. The main thread is in the acquiring GIL state.
The module thread release the GIL, yielding CPU to give the main thread
an opportunity to start
event processing, and then acquire the GIL again until the main thread
releases it.
This is what
redis#12817 (comment)
mentioned direction.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
pizhenwei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
fix some issues that come from sanitizer thread report.

1. when the main thread is updating daylight_active, other threads (bio,
module thread) may be writing logs at the same time.
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=661064)
  Read of size 4 at 0x55c9a4d11c70 by thread T2:
    #0 serverLogRaw /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:116 (redis-server+0x8d797) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #1 _serverLog.constprop.2 /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:146 (redis-server+0x2a3b14) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #2 bioProcessBackgroundJobs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/bio.c:329 (redis-server+0x1c24ca) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)

  Previous write of size 4 at 0x55c9a4d11c70 by main thread (mutexes: write M0, write M1, write M2, write M3):
    #0 updateCachedTimeWithUs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1102 (redis-server+0x925e7) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #1 updateCachedTimeWithUs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1087 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #2 updateCachedTime /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1118 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #3 afterSleep /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1811 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #4 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:389 (redis-server+0x85ae0) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #5 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:342 (redis-server+0x85ae0)
    #6 aeMain /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:477 (redis-server+0x85ae0)
    #7 main /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:7211 (redis-server+0x7168c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
```

2. thread leaks in module tests
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: thread leak (pid=668683)
  Thread T13 (tid=670041, finished) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1036 (libtsan.so.2+0x3d179) (BuildId: 28a9f70061dbb2dfa2cef661d3b23aff4ea13536)
    #1 HelloBlockNoTracking_RedisCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/tests/modules/blockonbackground.c:200 (blockonbackground.so+0x97fd) (BuildId: 9cd187906c57e88cdf896d121d1d96448b37a136)
    #2 HelloBlockNoTracking_RedisCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/tests/modules/blockonbackground.c:169 (blockonbackground.so+0x97fd)
    #3 call /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:3546 (redis-server+0x9b7fb) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #4 processCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:4176 (redis-server+0xa091c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #5 processCommandAndResetClient /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2468 (redis-server+0xd2b8e) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #6 processInputBuffer /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2576 (redis-server+0xd2b8e)
    #7 readQueryFromClient /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2722 (redis-server+0xd358f) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #8 callHandler /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/connhelpers.h:58 (redis-server+0x288a7b) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #9 connSocketEventHandler /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/socket.c:277 (redis-server+0x288a7b)
    #10 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:417 (redis-server+0x85b45) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #11 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:342 (redis-server+0x85b45)
    #12 aeMain /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:477 (redis-server+0x85b45)
    #13 main /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:7211 (redis-server+0x7168c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant