Deprecate tuples of chunks? #8341
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(I was planning on putting an issue in, but then thought it wasn't much more difficult to make the PR. But it's totally fine if we don't think this is a good idea...) Allowing a tuple of dims means we're reliant on dimension order, which we really try and not be reliant on. It also makes the type signature even more complicated. So are we OK to encourage a dict of `dim: chunksizes`, rather than a tuple of chunksizes?
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Member
|
I support this. This motivation was the reason why I tried to standardise the chunks properties by adding |
dcherian
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
max-sixty
added
plan to merge
max-sixty
commented
Oct 20, 2023
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(I was planning on putting an issue in, but then thought it wasn't much more difficult to make the PR. But it's totally fine if we don't think this is a good idea...)
Allowing a tuple of dims means we're reliant on dimension order, which we really try and not be reliant on. It also makes the type signature even more complicated.
So are we OK to encourage a dict of
dim: chunksize, rather than a tuple of chunksizes?