Skip to content

Conversation

@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator

This reverts commit 01ad131 (with 2 resolved conflicts)

See discussion in #1842 and issue #1973.

This gets us no close to full type hinting, but does at least fix a bit of breakage :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@janiversen janiversen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK for me, you can merge if you like

But please consider if this is really the way you want to go, what we have is what is actually being returned.

@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

But please consider if this is really the way you want to go, what we have is what is actually being returned.

Both signatures (with or without Union) are wrong, sadly. At least the revert will show in git history for future attempts to get it right. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@laundmo @MAKOMO any thoughts?

@janiversen
Copy link
Collaborator

As I wrote in the approval, if you feel it´s correct, then just merge it...and lets move on.

@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing in favor of #1980

@alexrudd2 alexrudd2 closed this Feb 9, 2024
@alexrudd2 alexrudd2 deleted the revert-1842 branch February 9, 2024 05:30
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants