Skip to content

Conversation

@undingen
Copy link
Contributor

@undingen undingen commented Sep 2, 2015

one of the problems were that depending on if all files were all ready parsed we JITed more or less functions,
this changed the total number of jited functions which changed all the module names.
This lead to the result that in order to have all entries inside the cache we needed at least 3runs if the pyc files were old.

The whole name scheme should add some point get improved but for now it should be enough.

one of the problems were that depending on if all files were all ready parsed we JITed more or less functions,
this changed the total number of jited functions which changed all the module names.
This lead to the result that in order to have all entries inside the cache we needed at least 3runs if the pyc files were old.

The whole name scheme should add some point get improved but for now it should be enough.
kmod added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2015
Generate better module names to make the object cache more effective
@kmod kmod merged commit e44735c into pyston:master Sep 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants