Skip to content

Conversation

@Kentzo
Copy link
Contributor

@Kentzo Kentzo commented Jan 12, 2023

@slateny
Copy link
Contributor

slateny commented Jan 14, 2023

Per comment I don't believe there should be a backport for this.

@Kentzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kentzo commented Jan 14, 2023

#99308 (comment) says otherwise

Copy link
Member

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Kentzo . One set of suggestions, otherwise LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for backporting this!

Looks like it's common enough for past versions of docs to contain "removed" for future versions of Python, so would you mind applying CAM's suggestions?

Edit: Since this has been lying around, I think this is fine to merge as is without the more specific directives; 3.12 isn't finalised and this seems like a short time between deprecation and removal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants