Skip to content

Conversation

kimishpatel
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: and add ability to split large work between gemm and gemv

Reviewed By: metascroy

Differential Revision: D71833068

Summary: and add ability to split large work between gemm and gemv

Reviewed By: metascroy

Differential Revision: D71833068
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/2040

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 794fdd6 with merge base 5cb1fa1 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 10, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71833068

@kimishpatel kimishpatel added topic: new feature Use this tag if this PR adds a new feature topic: performance Use this tag if this PR improves the performance of a feature labels Apr 10, 2025
@kimishpatel kimishpatel requested a review from metascroy April 10, 2025 20:49
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit c99e37c into pytorch:main Apr 10, 2025
20 of 24 checks passed
liangel-02 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
Differential Revision: D71833068

Pull Request resolved: #2040
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: new feature Use this tag if this PR adds a new feature topic: performance Use this tag if this PR improves the performance of a feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants