Use expect_no_lint() instead of expect_lint(., NULL)

[mcol]

This is a small part of #2737 (5 files), which should be manageable to review. If it's not desired, just close it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.24%. Comparing base (ae6b6a7) to head (c9a4702).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2950   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.24%   99.24%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines        7276     7276           
=======================================
  Hits         7221     7221           
  Misses         55       55           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[MichaelChirico]

Thank you! However, this will conflict with some pending PRs (e.g. #2829), so I'd prefer to avoid generating conflicts if possible. If you want to do the extra legwork to ensure there are no conflicts you can try adapting https://gist.github.com/MichaelChirico/64e981b4359a36d2279bf55c39c7d3dd (script for getting files by PR)

[mcol]

Thanks Michael. I've removed changes to files that were touched in any form by PRs opened since January, and gave a cursory glance to older ones (without seeing other conflicts). This is much smaller but better than nothing! :)

[MichaelChirico]

Great, thanks!