Skip to content

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Follow-up to #14523

The previous implementation did not take the unique passthrough record into account when formatting state.

To test the priority and non-priority scenarios, add exit(kaboom) in rabbit_amqqueue_process handle_call({basic_consume... then run PerfTest with these arguments:

--producers 1 --consumers 1 --pmessages 100 --queue-args x-max-priority=10

--producers 1 --consumers 1 --pmessages 100
```<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #14555 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

The previous implementation did not take the unique `passthrough` record
into account when formatting state.

To test the priority and non-priority scenarios, add `exit(kaboom)` in
`rabbit_amqqueue_process` `handle_call({basic_consume...` then run
PerfTest with these arguments:

```
--producers 1 --consumers 1 --pmessages 100 --queue-args x-max-priority=10

--producers 1 --consumers 1 --pmessages 100
```

(cherry picked from commit 9c90e85)
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis added this to the 4.2.0 milestone Sep 16, 2025
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis merged commit 49130b3 into v4.2.x Sep 16, 2025
287 checks passed
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis deleted the mergify/bp/v4.2.x/pr-14555 branch September 16, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants