fix setting scan_max_filesize #410
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the variable name $scan_max_filesize is being used to store the configuration value for the largest file size that should be scanned which is passed to find and also the largest file size in the signatures. add a new variable called $sig_max_filesize for that purpose and add a conditional check so that we don't override $scan_max_filesize if the user has set it in the configuration
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the variable name $scan_max_filesize is being used to store the configuration value for the largest file size that should be scanned which is passed to find and also the largest file size in the signatures.
add a new variable called $sig_max_filesize for that purpose and add a conditional check so that we don't override $scan_max_filesize if the user has set it in the configuration
this definitely needs some scrutiny