- 
        Couldn't load subscription status. 
- Fork 2.7k
          test: clean up unnecessary uses of match_exact
          #13879
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    There is no need to provide additional messages here.
              
                    Muscraft
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    May 7, 2024 
                  
              
              
            
            
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
| @bors r+ | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      May 7, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
test: clean up unnecessary uses of `match_exact` It was found during the review of <#13842 (comment)> We should be happy using `assert_match_exact` directly. The extra arguments to `match_exact` are not necessary for those test cases.
| 💔 Test failed - checks-actions | 
| @bors retry | 
| ☀️ Test successful - checks-actions | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      May 8, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Update cargo 10 commits in 05364cb2f61a2c2b091e061c1f42b207dfb5f81f..0ca60e940821c311c9b25a6423b59ccdbcea218f 2024-05-03 16:48:59 +0000 to 2024-05-08 01:54:25 +0000 - chore: Add cargo-lints to unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#13881) - test: clean up unnecessary uses of `match_exact` (rust-lang/cargo#13879) - docs(ref): Correct heading level of `[lints]` documentation (rust-lang/cargo#13878) - Fix: Build only the specified artifact library when multiple types are available (rust-lang/cargo#13842) - docs: add missing CARGO_MAKEFLAGS env for plugins (rust-lang/cargo#13872) - Add more documentation to `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` (rust-lang/cargo#13869) - fix(toml): Remove unstable rejrected frontmatter syntax for cargo script (rust-lang/cargo#13861) - Update UI example code in contributor guide (rust-lang/cargo#13864) - style(test): Remove check-cfg warning (rust-lang/cargo#13865) - Fix global_cache_tracker::max_download_size test flakiness (rust-lang/cargo#13860) r? ghost
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
It was found during the review of #13842 (comment)
We should be happy using
assert_match_exactdirectly.The extra arguments to
match_exactare not necessary for those test cases.