Eliminate the last three "did you mean" warning phrasings #15356
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
rustbot
added
A-manifest
joshtriplett
changed the title
joshtriplett
force-pushed
the
no-did-you-mean
branch
from
89d7205 to
9452003
Compare
epage
force-pushed
the
no-did-you-mean
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d3b0adb to
16ec1f2
Compare
epage
changed the title
FYI @joshtriplett I went ahead and updated the tests for this I also made a small stylistic tweak to better match the existing style of our messages |
weihanglo
reviewed
Sep 12, 2025
Inspired by rust-lang#15138 , this eliminates the last three instances. Also rephrase a comment that implied the use of "did you mean" suggestions.
epage
force-pushed
the
no-did-you-mean
branch
from
16ec1f2 to
9f7a23d
Compare
|
Oops rustfmt error. Feel free to merge after addressing it. |
epage
force-pushed
the
no-did-you-mean
branch
from
9f7a23d to
4d472de
Compare
epage
force-pushed
the
no-did-you-mean
branch
from
4d472de to
ef748ca
Compare
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2025
Update cargo submodule 19 commits in 24bb93c388fb8c211a37986539f24a819dc669d3..966f94733bbc94ca51ff9f1e4c49ad250ebbdc50 2025-09-10 23:16:07 +0000 to 2025-09-16 17:24:45 +0000 - fix(frontmatter): Improve error quality (rust-lang/cargo#15972) - fix: wrong variable name in documentation (rust-lang/cargo#15968) - Add "Optimizing Build Performance" section to the Cargo book (rust-lang/cargo#15924) - Remove extra apostrophe in environment-variables.md (rust-lang/cargo#15963) - Clarify warning for using `features` or `default-features` in `patch` (rust-lang/cargo#15953) - fix(frontmatter): Try alternative len code fences (rust-lang/cargo#15952) - feat(cli): Allow completions for third-party subcommand names (rust-lang/cargo#15961) - docs(index): Clarify what we mean by omitting features (rust-lang/cargo#15957) - fix(future): Report all content as a single Report (rust-lang/cargo#15943) - fix(complete): Show local crates/features over other members (rust-lang/cargo#15956) - docs(resolver): Describe the role of the lockfile (rust-lang/cargo#15958) - chore: Skip check-version-bump ci job in forks (rust-lang/cargo#15959) - Eliminate the last three "did you mean" warning phrasings (rust-lang/cargo#15356) - fix(info): Suggest a more universal `cargo tree` command (rust-lang/cargo#15954) - feat(cli): Use ellipses when truncating progress (rust-lang/cargo#15955) - feat(completer): Added completion for `--features` flag (rust-lang/cargo#15309) - fix(publish): Switch the 'ctrl-c on wait' line to a help message (rust-lang/cargo#15942) - docs: move docs building process to contributor guide (rust-lang/cargo#15854) - fix(manifest): Show error source to users (rust-lang/cargo#15939) r? ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Inspired by #15138 , this
eliminates the last three instances.
Also rephrase a comment that implied the use of "did you mean"
suggestions. Fix an adjacent typo in that comment as well.