Skip to content

working group review #187

@nikomatsakis

Description

@nikomatsakis

Meeting proposal info

  • Title: working group review
  • Type: non-technical
  • Proposed by: nikomatsakis
  • Link: TBD, but see below
  • Scheduled dates for discussion:

Summary

The basic idea is to talk about the working group system we adopted earlier this year. How's it working out? Thoughts, concerns? I think before the meeting we would do a survey to take the general temperature, and during the meeting we'd shape the agenda based on the results of that meeting.

Some topics we might look at:

  • Is sharing the wg updates with triage meeting good?
  • Can we rename working groups to avoid confusing with domain working groups like embedded? (The embedded wg has proposed the term "Projects", for example.)
  • How to manage working group membership?

About this issue

This issue corresponds to a meeting proposal for the compiler team
steering meeting. It corresponds to a possible topic of
discussion. You can read more about the steering meeting procedure
here
.

Comment policy

These issues are meant to be used as an "announcements channel"
regarding the proposal, and not as a place to discuss the technical
details. Feel free to subscribe to updates. We'll post comments when
reviewing the proposal in meetings or making a scheduling decision.
In the meantime, if you have questions or ideas, ping the proposers
on Zulip (or elsewhere).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions