Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow` #147124

a1phyr · 2025-09-28T13:25:02Z

This move a branch and more code into the cold method finish_grow, which means that less code is inlined at each try_reserve site. Additionally, this reduces the amount of parameters, so they can all be passed by registers.

This move a branch and more code into the cold method `finish_grow`, which means that less code is inlined at each `try_reserve` site. Additionally, this reduces the amount of parameters, so they can all be passed by registers.

rustbot · 2025-09-28T13:25:07Z

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Kobzol · 2025-09-28T13:27:02Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow`

rust-bors · 2025-09-28T15:42:48Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 006e85f (006e85fa61b49abee68e8f45daa550ffd4a90c84, parent: 4ffeda10e10d4fa0c8edbd0dd9642d8ae7d3e66e)

rust-timer · 2025-09-28T16:53:38Z

Finished benchmarking commit (006e85f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.0%	[3.0%, 3.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.6%	[-0.3%, 3.0%]	4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.0%	[-2.0%, -2.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-2.0%, 2.3%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary -3.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-3.0%, -3.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.3%, -0.0%]	19
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-1.1%, -0.1%]	42
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.3%, -0.0%]	19

Bootstrap: 469.714s -> 468.998s (-0.15%)
Artifact size: 387.67 MiB -> 387.45 MiB (-0.06%)

Mark-Simulacrum · 2025-10-11T18:58:03Z

Seems like this is a small binary size win at the cost of a few instruction count/cycle regressions, but very small ones (including when looking at the aggregate across all our benchmarks).

@bors r+

bors · 2025-10-11T18:58:06Z

📌 Commit e52fe65 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2025-10-11T19:40:55Z

⌛ Testing commit e52fe65 with merge be0ade2...

bors · 2025-10-11T22:44:22Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing be0ade2 to master...

github-actions · 2025-10-11T22:47:46Z

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 360a3a4 (parent) -> be0ade2 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard be0ade2b602bdfe37a3cc259fcc79e8624dcba94 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

aarch64-apple: 9434.6s -> 7663.7s (-18.8%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-2: 4925.6s -> 5648.1s (14.7%)
dist-apple-various: 3635.3s -> 4101.9s (12.8%)
dist-s390x-linux: 5460.0s -> 4920.2s (-9.9%)
x86_64-msvc-2: 7258.5s -> 6656.4s (-8.3%)
x86_64-gnu-aux: 6605.1s -> 6079.8s (-8.0%)
dist-sparcv9-solaris: 5256.9s -> 4847.2s (-7.8%)
dist-x86_64-apple: 6654.0s -> 7150.9s (7.5%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6645.9s -> 6173.0s (-7.1%)
test-various: 4664.1s -> 4332.9s (-7.1%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

rust-timer · 2025-10-11T23:54:57Z

Finished benchmarking commit (be0ade2): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.0%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary -2.2%, secondary 0.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[1.9%, 3.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.2%, -0.0%]	19
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.9%, -0.2%]	39
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.2%, -0.0%]	19

Bootstrap: 473.775s -> 472.888s (-0.19%)
Artifact size: 388.16 MiB -> 388.10 MiB (-0.01%)

…imulacrum Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow` This move a branch and more code into the cold method `finish_grow`, which means that less code is inlined at each `try_reserve` site. Additionally, this reduces the amount of parameters, so they can all be passed by registers.

Move more code to RawVec::finish_grow

e52fe65

This move a branch and more code into the cold method `finish_grow`, which means that less code is inlined at each `try_reserve` site. Additionally, this reduces the amount of parameters, so they can all be passed by registers.

rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum Sep 28, 2025

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 28, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2025

Auto merge of #147124 - a1phyr:improve_finish_grow, r=<try>

006e85f

Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow`

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 28, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Sep 28, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2025

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 11, 2025

bors merged commit be0ade2 into rust-lang:master Oct 11, 2025
12 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.92.0 milestone Oct 11, 2025

rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Oct 11, 2025

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025

Toolchain upgrade to nightly-2025-11-07 flux-rs/flux#1345

Draft

Move more code to RawVec::finish_grow #147124

Move more code to RawVec::finish_grow #147124

Uh oh!

Conversation

a1phyr commented Sep 28, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Sep 28, 2025

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented Sep 28, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Sep 28, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

Mark-Simulacrum commented Oct 11, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 11, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 11, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 11, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2025

Test differences

Job duration changes

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Oct 11, 2025

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow` #147124

Move more code to `RawVec::finish_grow` #147124