1.3.0 Release

[nblumhardt]

• Added functionality to support the destructurer operator in BeginScope. #51 - support @ operator in formatted scope messages
• Fixes #50 - include named scopes #55 - add hierarchical Scope property and capture more scope types including "names"

[cilerler]

Following code

using (Logger.BeginScope("Some name"))
using (Logger.BeginScope(42))
using (Logger.BeginScope("Formatted {WithValue}", 12345))
using (Logger.BeginScope(new Dictionary<string, object> { ["ViaDictionary"] = 100 }))

ends up as

and not like this

as stated in here for Scope item

I saw that while testing the following code

using (Logger.BeginScope("Scoping {CommandName} {Reference}", GetType().Name, Guid.NewGuid()))

[nblumhardt]

@cilerler thanks for checking it out. I've just installed the latest -pre:

    "Serilog.Extensions.Logging": "1.3.0-dev-10129",
    "Serilog.Sinks.Seq": "3.1.1"

With the following in Startup.cs:

            loggerFactory.AddSerilog(new LoggerConfiguration()
                .WriteTo.Seq("http://localhost:5341")
                .CreateLogger());

And the following in HomeController.cs:

    public class HomeController : Controller
    {
        ILogger<HomeController> Logger;

        public HomeController(ILogger<HomeController> logger)
        {
            Logger = logger;
        }

        public IActionResult Index()
        {
            using (Logger.BeginScope("Some name"))
            using (Logger.BeginScope(42))
            using (Logger.BeginScope("Formatted {WithValue}", 12345))
            using (Logger.BeginScope(new Dictionary<string, object> { ["ViaDictionary"] = 100 }))
            {
                Logger.LogInformation("In");
            }

            return View();
        }

Result in Seq:

Can you spot any differences with the setup you're using?

[cilerler]

project.json

"Seq.Extensions.Logging": "2.1.0-dev-00022",

Startup.cs

public void Configure(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
    loggerFactory.AddConsole(Configuration.GetSection("Logging"));
    loggerFactory.AddDebug();
    loggerFactory.AddSeq(Configuration.GetSection("Seq"));
}

I do use Console application which shouldn't response differently but wanted to mention anyway.

[nblumhardt]

Aha :-) that would be this project.

If you change the version of the package to 2.1.1 you should get the output you're expecting.

Cheers!

[cilerler]

Sorry about that, changed it and confirming that it is working like a charm. Thanks again! 😎

[merbla]

@nblumhardt should we take to opportunity to bump to https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions/1.1.0

[merbla]

And possibly v2.3.0 of Serilog?

[nblumhardt]

@merbla keen to push the version of the Serilog dependency forwards; I think it might be a bit early to cut off support for the 1.0 version of MEL, though - may be some apps that can't move forward yet.

Perhaps we bump both versions up in dev and do that in the next point release?