Skip to content

Conversation

@pawanjay176
Copy link
Member

@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 commented Mar 8, 2024

Issue Addressed

N/A

Proposed Changes

Downgrade rate limited logs for all protocols where the expected responses > 1
This is not really an issue but we are seeing a few caplin peers on sepolia that are sending us a lot of blobroot requests, so this might happen on other networks too which might lead to a lot of users asking us about it on discord

@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 requested a review from jxs March 8, 2024 09:02
@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 added the ready-for-review The code is ready for review label Mar 8, 2024
| Protocol::BlobsByRange
| Protocol::BlocksByRoot
| Protocol::BlobsByRoot
) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The log below need to be updated too - remove "By range", and may be worth mentioning that request is too large

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 907dc34

@jimmygchen jimmygchen added waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Mar 8, 2024
@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 added ready-for-review The code is ready for review and removed waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. labels Mar 8, 2024
@AgeManning
Copy link
Member

AgeManning commented Mar 10, 2024

@Mergifyio queue

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Mar 10, 2024

queue

✅ The pull request has been merged automatically

The pull request has been merged automatically at 54b1c22

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 54b1c22 into sigp:unstable Mar 10, 2024
@paulhauner paulhauner mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024
danielrachi1 pushed a commit to danielrachi1/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
* Address review comments

* Downgrade log for by_root requests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-review The code is ready for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants