Skip to content

Conversation

ddaspit
Copy link
Contributor

@ddaspit ddaspit commented Apr 23, 2025

This change is Reviewable

@ddaspit ddaspit requested a review from johnml1135 April 23, 2025 19:14
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.64%. Comparing base (7e7e033) to head (37e36db).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #170   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.63%   88.64%           
=======================================
  Files         277      277           
  Lines       16621    16632   +11     
=======================================
+ Hits        14732    14743   +11     
  Misses       1889     1889           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ddaspit ddaspit force-pushed the implicitly-closed-style branch from 66fb5b4 to 546fe70 Compare April 23, 2025 22:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@Enkidu93 Enkidu93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me! (...but of course, John's more familiar with this issue and with this part of the code)

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @johnml1135)

- only skip/collect tokens if the marker is explicitly closed
- fm markers are not footnote elements
- only end note text when a ft marker is closed
@ddaspit ddaspit force-pushed the implicitly-closed-style branch from 546fe70 to 37e36db Compare April 28, 2025 16:16
@ddaspit ddaspit merged commit 962ca36 into main Apr 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@ddaspit ddaspit deleted the implicitly-closed-style branch April 28, 2025 16:29
@Enkidu93 Enkidu93 mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants