[Snyk] Security upgrade @graphql-yoga/node from 2.6.0 to 2.13.5

[skmezanul]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• package.json
• package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score
	Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime SNYK-JS-UNDICI-10176064	508

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @skmezanul, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, Gemini here with a summary of this pull request. This PR was automatically generated by Snyk to address a security vulnerability by upgrading the @graphql-yoga/node dependency. Specifically, it upgrades the package from version 2.6.0 to 2.13.5. This change primarily affects the project's dependency management files (package.json and package-lock.json).

Highlights

• Security Upgrade: The primary goal of this PR is to fix a security vulnerability (SNYK-JS-UNDICI-10176064) by upgrading the @graphql-yoga/node dependency.
• Dependency Version Bump: The @graphql-yoga/node package is updated from version 2.6.0 to 2.13.5.
• Automated PR: This pull request was automatically created by Snyk as part of an automated security scanning workflow.

Changelog

• package-lock.json
  • Updated lock file to reflect the new version of @graphql-yoga/node and potentially other transitive dependencies.
• package.json
  • Updated the version of @graphql-yoga/node dependency from 2.6.0 to 2.13.5.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

A package version old,
A vulnerability unfolds.
Upgrade the code,
Lighten the load,
A safer story told.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades @graphql-yoga/node from version 2.6.0 to 2.13.5. The primary goal is to address the security vulnerability SNYK-JS-UNDICI-10176064 (Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime).

The upgrade appears to be a minor version increment, and Snyk's metadata indicates isBreakingChange:false. However, given that this spans several minor versions, careful review and testing are essential.

Summary of Findings

• Dependency Version Jump: The @graphql-yoga/node package is being upgraded from 2.6.0 to 2.13.5. This skips multiple minor versions. It's recommended to review the intervening changelogs and conduct thorough testing to ensure no unexpected issues or missed improvements.

Merge Readiness

This PR addresses an important security vulnerability by upgrading @graphql-yoga/node. While Snyk reports no breaking changes, the jump from v2.6.0 to v2.13.5 is substantial. I recommend that before merging, the maintainers review the changelogs for @graphql-yoga/node between these versions and ensure that comprehensive testing (including CI and potentially manual QA) is completed to catch any regressions or subtle behavioral changes. Once these checks are satisfactory, the PR should be good to merge. As an AI, I am not authorized to approve pull requests; this decision rests with the project maintainers.

[gemini-code-assist]

This upgrade changes @graphql-yoga/node from 2.6.0 to 2.13.5, a jump of seven minor versions.

While Snyk indicates this is not a breaking change, it's crucial to perform due diligence:

1. Changelog Review: Could we ensure that the changelogs for @graphql-yoga/node (versions between 2.6.0 and 2.13.5) are reviewed? This is to identify any deprecated APIs, subtle behavior changes, new recommendations, or performance considerations that might impact our current usage, particularly in src/GraphQL/ParseGraphQLServer.js where createServer and renderGraphiQL are used.
2. Thorough Testing: Beyond automated CI checks, comprehensive testing (including manual checks if applicable) should be performed. The existing test suite in spec/ParseGraphQLServer.spec.js should be a good starting point to catch regressions.

Given this is a significant minor version jump, confirming these steps are taken would be important for maintaining stability and quality.