Skip to content

Conversation

RReichert
Copy link
Contributor

@RReichert RReichert commented Jun 1, 2023

Changes

We can now specify an option to add further checks for our work in orion-engine for our ASIL compliance. These checks will validate that we are complying with our Google Style Guide.

See: https://github.com/swift-nav/orion-engine/pull/6693 which uses this work to flag non compliance.

ClangTidy.cmake Outdated
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be added to avoid a bug in clang-tidy that only has been recently been fixed - llvm/llvm-project#46097

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 1, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@RReichert RReichert changed the title Clang tidy Google Style Guide [OI-110] Clang tidy Google Style Guide Jul 14, 2023
@RReichert RReichert force-pushed the rodrigor/integrity-tidy branch from b232e08 to 5e8c54e Compare July 14, 2023 12:05
@RReichert RReichert requested review from krisukox and woodfell July 14, 2023 12:34
@RReichert RReichert force-pushed the rodrigor/integrity-tidy branch from a1a95d7 to 546b140 Compare July 15, 2023 02:25
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@silverjam silverjam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we doing this in CMake when this was already implemented in Bazel? We have a mandate (from the VP of engineering and the software VP) to migrate to Bazel, implementing new features in CMake takes us farther away from that goal. CMake should be considered as "maintenance mode" only -- new work in CMake should have a very clear justification why it's not possible in Bazel and DevInfra needs to be made aware so that we can plan to bring Bazel into parity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants