[6.0] Implement --checksum option on swift sdk install
#7723
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This option [was specified in the corresponding proposal for Swift SDKs](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0387-cross-compilation-destinations.md#swift-sdk-installation-and-configuration): > For Swift SDKs installed from remote URLs an additional `--checksum` option is required, through which users of a Swift SDK can specify a checksum provided by a publisher of the SDK. The latter can produce a checksum by running `swift package compute-checksum command` (introduced in [SE-0272](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0272-swiftpm-binary-dependencies.md)) with the Swift SDK bundle archive as an argument. # Conflicts: # Sources/SwiftSDKCommand/InstallSwiftSDK.swift # Sources/SwiftSDKCommand/ListSwiftSDKs.swift # Sources/SwiftSDKCommand/SwiftSDKCommand.swift
MaxDesiatov
added
enhancement
cross-compilation
command-line interface
swift 6.0
|
@swift-ci test |
MaxDesiatov
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2024
Cherry-pick of #7748. **Explanation**: This feature [was specified in the corresponding proposal for Swift SDKs](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0387-cross-compilation-destinations.md#swift-sdk-installation-and-configuration): > For Swift SDKs installed from remote URLs an additional `--checksum` option is required, through which users of a Swift SDK can specify a checksum provided by a publisher of the SDK. The latter can produce a checksum by running `swift package compute-checksum` command (introduced in [SE-0272](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0272-swiftpm-binary-dependencies.md)) with the Swift SDK bundle archive as an argument. Currently, `swift package compute-checksum` is unable to handle `.tar.gz` bundles, which is a commonly used format for Swift SDKs. We're fixing that here by adding correct and unified handling for archive extensions. This change is isolated to the `swift package compute-checksum` subcommand. The `--checksum` option is added in a subsequent PR: #7722. **Scope**: Isolated to `swift package compute-checksum` subcommand. **Risk**: Low, no existing behavior is **Testing**: Automated test cases modified/added and passing in a subsequent PR: #7723 **Issue**: rdar://130590711 **Reviewer**: @bnbarham
|
@swift-ci test |
bnbarham
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2024
|
@swift-ci test windows |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of #7722.
Explanation: This option was specified in the corresponding proposal for Swift SDKs:
Scope: the change is isolated to
swift sdk installandswift package compute-checksumsubcommands.Risk: low due to isolation to only two rarely used subcommands with corresponding automated test cases provided.
Testing: updated existing test cases.
Issue: rdar://130590711
Reviewer: @bnbarham