Skip to content

Conversation

joehinkle11
Copy link

No description provided.

This is helpful for clients who need to encode the syntax kind stripped of the type
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Nov 16, 2023

We explicitly removed the conformance of SyntaxKind to CaseIterable in #2292.

Out of curiosity: Why do you need to iterate over all elements in SyntaxKind? There shouldn’t be any good reason to iterate over all the nodes, AFAICT.

@joehinkle11
Copy link
Author

No I don't need it. Not sure what I was thinking TBH

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants