chore(deps): update aspire to 9.4.2

[thomhurst]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
Aspire.AppHost.Sdk	msbuild-sdk	patch	9.4.1 -> 9.4.2
Aspire.Hosting.AppHost	nuget	patch	9.4.1 -> 9.4.2
Aspire.Hosting.Redis	nuget	patch	9.4.1 -> 9.4.2
Aspire.Hosting.Testing	nuget	patch	9.4.1 -> 9.4.2
Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching	nuget	patch	9.4.1 -> 9.4.2

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[claude]

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job

---

Aspire Dependency Update Review ✅

I've completed my review of this Renovate Bot PR that updates Aspire packages from 9.4.1 to 9.4.2.

Todo List:

• Read and analyze the changed project files to understand the dependency updates
• Review the nature of the Aspire package updates (patch version 9.4.1 → 9.4.2)
• Assess potential impact on TUnit template functionality
• Check for any security or compatibility concerns
• Provide comprehensive review feedback covering code quality, bugs, performance, security, and test coverage

---

Review Feedback

📋 Summary

This PR updates 5 Aspire packages across 4 template project files from version 9.4.1 to 9.4.2. The changes are straightforward version number updates in .csproj files.

🏗️ Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Clean changes: All updates are simple version number increments in PackageReference elements
• Consistent versioning: All Aspire packages are being updated to the same version (9.4.2) ensuring compatibility
• Proper scope: Only template files are affected, which is appropriate for this type of dependency update

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues ✅

• No concerns: This is a patch version update (9.4.1 → 9.4.2) following semantic versioning
• Template isolation: Changes are contained within template projects, minimizing risk to core TUnit functionality
• Incomplete update noticed: ExampleNamespace.ServiceDefaults.csproj still references Microsoft.Extensions.ServiceDiscovery version 9.4.1, but this appears to be intentional as it wasn't included in Renovate's scope

⚡ Performance Considerations ✅

• Patch updates typically improve performance: Patch versions often contain bug fixes and performance optimizations
• No breaking changes expected: Aspire 9.4.2 should be a drop-in replacement for 9.4.1
• Template impact only: These changes only affect project templates, not the runtime performance of TUnit itself

🔒 Security Concerns ✅

• Security improvements: Patch updates often include security fixes
• Trusted source: Aspire is developed by Microsoft and has established security practices
• Dependency freshness: Keeping dependencies up-to-date reduces exposure to known vulnerabilities

🧪 Test Coverage ✅

• Template testing: The changes affect template projects that include test projects (ExampleNamespace.TestProject.csproj and ExampleNamespace.csproj)
• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: Both test projects use this package which is being updated, maintaining test compatibility
• Integration tests recommended: While not blocking, it would be beneficial to verify templates work correctly with the new Aspire version

📦 Packages Updated

1. Aspire.AppHost.Sdk: 9.4.1 → 9.4.2 (in ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:3)
2. Aspire.Hosting.AppHost: 9.4.1 → 9.4.2 (in ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:15)
3. Aspire.Hosting.Redis: 9.4.1 → 9.4.2 (in ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:16)
4. Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.4.1 → 9.4.2 (in both test projects)
5. Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching: 9.4.1 → 9.4.2 (in ExampleNamespace.WebApp.csproj:10)

✅ Recommendation: APPROVE

This is a safe, routine dependency update that follows best practices. The patch version bump indicates backward compatibility, and the changes are isolated to template projects. The automerge configuration is appropriate for this type of low-risk update.

---