Skip to content

Conversation

DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 commented Oct 10, 2024

huggingface/transformers#33401 has been fixed in Transformers v4.45.2, but the devs have clarified that M-ROPE is intended to be configured as rope_type="default". To avoid future compatibility issues, this PR updates the RoPE code in vLLM to follow their specification.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 changed the title [Misc] Update LoRA handling for Qwen2-VL to conform to Transformers [Misc] Update RoPE handling for Qwen2-VL to conform to Transformers Oct 10, 2024
Comment on lines -927 to -928
if scaling_type not in {"su", "longrope"}:
scaling_factor = rope_scaling.get("factor", 1.0)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not clear which RoPE implementations need this, so I've moved this code into the individual if blocks.

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 changed the title [Misc] Update RoPE handling for Qwen2-VL to conform to Transformers [Misc] Standardize RoPE handling for Qwen2-VL Oct 10, 2024
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Oct 10, 2024
@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member Author

@ywang96 PTAL when you have time.

@ZhangYaoFu
Copy link

Can mrope be completed using specialized CUDA operators? According to the profile results, this part is quite time-consuming.

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member Author

Can mrope be completed using specialized CUDA operators? According to the profile results, this part is quite time-consuming.

Can you open a new issue for this? Thanks

Copy link
Member

@ywang96 ywang96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left two comments - PTAL!

Copy link
Member

@Isotr0py Isotr0py left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After testing on Qwen2-VL and Phi-3-medium, I'm fine with these changes since su and mrope are both handled with patching correctly.

@Isotr0py Isotr0py merged commit 7e7eae3 into main Oct 16, 2024
76 checks passed
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 deleted the qwen2vl-lora branch October 16, 2024 05:57
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
garg-amit pushed a commit to garg-amit/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
FerdinandZhong pushed a commit to FerdinandZhong/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
sumitd2 pushed a commit to sumitd2/vllm that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
LeiWang1999 pushed a commit to LeiWang1999/vllm-bitblas that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants