[agenda] 2025-05-15

[npdoty]

Proposed Agenda

1. Introductions, Code of Conduct
2. Reviews

• Web Neural Network API 2025-03-20 > 2025-06-20 w3cping/privacy-request#156 @sandandsnow
• Web Authentication 2025-04-24 > 2025-05-25 w3cping/privacy-request#162

3. GPC

• Use HTTP structured field values gpc#6
• Meaning of lastUpdate for "strange" dates gpc#103
• Consistency in use of sell/share/track/target terminology gpc#94 Align all descriptions of GPC to say it's meant to restrict sale and sharing of data. gpc#102 Align all descriptions of GPC to say it restricts sharing and targeting between different organizations. gpc#104 -- brief checkin

4. AOB

---

Please add comments to this issue if you have suggestions for agenda items.

[npdoty]

We didn't have time to get to Web Neural Network API on our last call:
w3cping/privacy-request#156
@sandandsnow

[npdoty]

WebAuthn has a new Level 3 spec that needs review:
w3cping/privacy-request#162
especially relevant might be the new features of getClientCapabilities and extensions. We may not have a completed review by this meeting, but will need to assign a couple folks willing to look into it more closely.

[npdoty]

GPC:

• Use HTTP structured field values gpc#6
• Meaning of lastUpdate for "strange" dates gpc#103
• Consistency in use of sell/share/track/target terminology gpc#94 Align all descriptions of GPC to say it's meant to restrict sale and sharing of data. gpc#102 -- brief checkin

[anssiko]

Sorry for chiming in on this closed issue, but I wanted to retain this context.

From the Neural Network API discussion (2025-05-15 minutes) I infer the Privacy WG would like the WebML WG to ensure "the new API to allow developers to probe feature support per operator" (aka opSupportLimits()) design is compatible with a future where there may no longer be 1:1 correlation between the OS/browser version and the support per operator. Whether this assumption holds true depends on how the underlying software ecosystem develops.

If I got your discussion right, to address this feedback, I'd propose to the WebML WG to document this in the Neural Network API Privacy Considerations. If you have a concrete text proposal the WG is happy to integrate it, otherwise we'll craft a proposal for your review. Please let us know.

Thank you for the discussion and slotting this topic to your busy calendar!

cc @pes10k