Skip to content

Conversation

@domenic
Copy link
Member

@domenic domenic commented Apr 5, 2016

Fixes #982. The "a user agent could ignore calls" is moved from the
non-normative implementation notes to the normative algorithm, and the
implementation notes are updated with a pointer to this.

@beidson, can you review?

@domenic domenic added the clarification Standard could be clearer label Apr 5, 2016
source Outdated
listeners that are not triggered in response to a clear user action, or that are invoked in rapid
succession.</p>
<p>For both <code data-x="dom-history-pushState">pushState()</code> and <code
data-x="dom-history-replaceState">replaceState()</code>, user agents should be careful to prevent
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this appears in a non-normative section, we cannot use should.

@beidson
Copy link

beidson commented Apr 6, 2016

Lgtm, except for what @annevk already noted.

domenic added 2 commits April 6, 2016 15:39
It should be next to the other session history stuff.
Fixes #982. The "a user agent could ignore calls" is moved from the
non-normative implementation notes to the normative algorithm, and the
implementation notes are updated with a pointer to this.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clarification Standard could be clearer topic: history

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants