Skip to content

Bad chocolatey package dependency #6439

@jeffrson

Description

@jeffrson

Well - there's been this PR #5925 - which, uh, I don't like, to say the least.

It's simply a bad idea to change package behaviour that drastically. Because "some people request it". So choco yarn would like to downgrade node 10 to node 6.9.2? No good - even if it would've been node 8 (which is the correct lts).

If you can't depend on nodejs.install OR nodejs-lts then why depend on it at all? yarn*msi installs fine without node. It should be completely up to the user which nodejs they install and how they do it (node.exe, chocolatey, nvm, a.s.o.)!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions