movement maps between class definitions

[Konfekt]

Similar to [m,]m which correspond to [[,]] in C for bigger leaps

[zzzyxwvut]

Aren't we already better off with context-aware motion from
relying on syntax item folding and making use of &foldcolumn
with &relativenumber for any counted [z etc.? The default
[m[{ motion can also move the cursor out of a method's body
and towards the beginning of its enclosing type header.

Any of ‘class’, ‘interface’, or ‘enum’ is not uncommon in
Javadoc comments ; ‘record’ is a valid name for a variable
or a method. For example, try traversing the source files
of java.lang.String and java.lang.Object from their top
lines with the proposed mapping ]}.

[Konfekt]

[z

and

Any of ‘class’, ‘interface’, or ‘enum’ is not uncommon in Javadoc comments ; ‘record’ is a valid name for a variable or a method.

Since syntax and folding is optional, these mappings could be overridden in case syntax and folding is enabled. Without these, it will become cumbersome to write a reliable mapping.

The default [m[{ motion can also move the cursor out of a method's body and towards the beginning of its enclosing type header.

I was not aware of this combination. What's the counterpart to it to move to the next (instead of previous) class?