Skip to content

Conversation

@michaellin6
Copy link
Contributor

Description

G1 asset in Nucleus was updated breaking the locomanipulation mimic workflow since one of the pick place datasets was recorded before the asset changes. The old G1 asset was included as a copy in a different path, and this PR updates the G1 asset to point to that temporary path. In the long term, a new dataset will be collected but needs to go through testing.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the contribution guidelines
  • I have run the pre-commit checks with ./isaaclab.sh --format
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have updated the changelog and the corresponding version in the extension's config/extension.toml file
  • I have added my name to the CONTRIBUTORS.md or my name already exists there

Isaac Nucleus is not compatible with the dataset recorded.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the asset New asset feature or request label Sep 30, 2025
@michaellin6 michaellin6 self-assigned this Sep 30, 2025
@michaellin6 michaellin6 requested review from ooctipus and removed request for ooctipus September 30, 2025 23:55
@stevfeng
Copy link

stevfeng commented Oct 1, 2025

Looks good to me, we need to make sure ISAAC_NUCLEUS_DIR points to the 5.1 staging server

G1_29DOF_CFG = ArticulationCfg(
spawn=sim_utils.UsdFileCfg(
usd_path=f"{ISAAC_NUCLEUS_DIR}/Robots/Unitree/G1/g1.usd",
usd_path=f"{ISAAC_NUCLEUS_DIR}/Samples/Groot/Robots/g1_29dof_hand.usd",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes the temporary asset global for all the environments in IsaacLab, right? Is that intentional? We want to use the most sim-ready asset at all places. If only Mimic workflow requires the old asset version, please make the change for it over there instead.

@michaellin6
Copy link
Contributor Author

These changes are not necessary now as we have updated the datasets that were broken by the asset change rather than keeping a temporary copy of the old asset.

@michaellin6 michaellin6 closed this Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

asset New asset feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants