Allow large UDT buffers for netfx

[alsicbv]

fixes #329 for netfx

The fix in #340 was only for netcore. Issue #329 still exists when using EF core on Net Framework.

/cc @ajcvickers @aprognimak @Wraith2

[Wraith2]

It'll do the job. I'd prefer the new exception type and message from the other PR to come over as well but it should almost never be thrown so it isn't a huge probem.

[alsicbv]

It'll do the job. I'd prefer the new exception type and message from the other PR to come over as well but it should almost never be thrown so it isn't a huge probem.

@Wraith2 What should be done to have this reviewed and merged? It seems I don't have rights to request a review.

[Wraith2]

You just wait i'm afraid.

[cheenamalhotra]

Hi @alsicbv

As @Wraith2 mentioned before, please include all necessary changes from NetCore PR here. We are only waiting for that in order to get this merged.

[Wraith2]

In all fairness to @alsicbv as a contributor I can only make suggestions and it wasn't clear that it was my suggestion that was being waited for. I think both he and I assumed that the PR was waiting for review from the owner side.

[cheenamalhotra]

Oops!
You do bring valuable suggestions @Wraith2 , I'll make a note to highlight the same next time!

[alsicbv]

Oops!
You do bring valuable suggestions @Wraith2 , I'll make a note to highlight the same next time!

Ok, it wasn't clear to me... Thanks for clarifying, I'm not working tomorrow so I'll do it on Friday!

[dnfclas]

All CLA requirements met.

[alsicbv]

Hi @cheenamalhotra

As @Wraith2 mentioned before, please include all necessary changes from NetCore PR here. We are only waiting for that in order to get this merged.

I've made all changes from the original PR

[cheenamalhotra]

Just a minor suggestion