Skip to content

[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to latest versions #10386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to latest versions #10386

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 8, 2025

Conversation

trentm
Copy link
Member

@trentm trentm commented Oct 7, 2025

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

See #7327 for an earlier update of the same sort.

/cc @elastic/apm-agent-java @elastic/apm-agent-python because I'm updating your EDOT SDK docker image versions as well.

@trentm
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
a18d1e9 
…latest versions

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.
@trentm trentm self-assigned this Oct 7, 2025
@trentm trentm requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 15:38
@trentm trentm added the backport-active-all Automated backport with mergify to all the active branches label Oct 7, 2025
@trentm trentm mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2025
Merged
2 tasks
@ChrsMark
Copy link
Member

ChrsMark commented Oct 8, 2025

@trentm I guess this one supersedes #9896?

@ChrsMark ChrsMark mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2025
Closed
@trentm
Copy link
Member Author

trentm commented Oct 8, 2025

@trentm I guess this one supersedes #9896?

@ChrsMark Oh. I'd forgotten that there was automation setup to update this now. I assume there wasn't because the image versions were all out of date. It turns out it was because the automation PR (that I didn't look for) hadn't been merged.

Merging either one of them should be fine.
However, I notice that they use slightly different backport* labels. Not sure if that matters.
These changes should make it to 8.x and 9.x, so perhaps the backport-active-8/backport-active-9 labels used in the other PR are slightly more accurate. Is there and active 7.x branch?

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

History

cc @trentm

@trentm trentm merged commit 11dd425 into elastic:main Oct 8, 2025
21 checks passed
@trentm trentm deleted the trentm-update-edot-sdk-image-versions-202510 branch October 8, 2025 23:26
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

@Mergifyio backport 8.18 8.19 9.0 9.1 9.2

@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

backport 8.18 8.19 9.0 9.1 9.2

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
@trentm @mergify
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
be96ed3 
…latest versions (#10386)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
@trentm @mergify
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
c2c54ff 
…latest versions (#10386)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)
This was referenced Oct 8, 2025
Closed
Merged
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
@trentm @mergify
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
7b84635 
…latest versions (#10386)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2025
Closed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
@trentm @mergify
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
ea90ec5 
…latest versions (#10386)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
@trentm @mergify
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
662de28 
…latest versions (#10386)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)
This was referenced Oct 8, 2025
Merged
Merged
@ChrsMark
Copy link
Member

ChrsMark commented Oct 9, 2025

@trentm I guess this one supersedes #9896?

@ChrsMark Oh. I'd forgotten that there was automation setup to update this now. I assume there wasn't because the image versions were all out of date. It turns out it was because the automation PR (that I didn't look for) hadn't been merged.

Merging either one of them should be fine. However, I notice that they use slightly different backport* labels. Not sure if that matters. These changes should make it to 8.x and 9.x, so perhaps the backport-active-8/backport-active-9 labels used in the other PR are slightly more accurate. Is there and active 7.x branch?

@trentm I think we should only backport to 8-active and 9-active since new versions come with new features and porting back to 9.1 for example is not correct.

@ChrsMark ChrsMark added backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches backport-active-8 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 8.[0-9]+ branches and removed backport-active-all Automated backport with mergify to all the active branches labels Oct 9, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@Mergifyio backport 8.18 8.19 9.0 9.1 9.2

1 similar comment
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@Mergifyio backport 8.18 8.19 9.0 9.1 9.2

@mergify Mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 9, 2025

backport 8.18 8.19 9.0 9.1 9.2

✅ Backports have been created

@trentm
Copy link
Member Author

trentm commented Oct 10, 2025

I think we should only backport to 8-active and 9-active since new versions come with new features and porting back to 9.1 for example is not correct.

@ChrsMark I'm confused by this. Using backport-active-9 would include 9.1, IIUC.

trentm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
@mergify @trentm
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
99b52c4 
…latest versions (#10386) (#10426)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)

Co-authored-by: Trent Mick <[email protected]>
trentm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
@mergify @trentm
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
b49b6f3 
…latest versions (#10386) (#10428)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)

Co-authored-by: Trent Mick <[email protected]>
trentm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
@mergify @trentm
[otel/kube-stack] Update EDOT SDK k8s auto-instrumentation images to …
9708ae5 
…latest versions (#10386) (#10429)

This also updates the vanilla OTel Go image version to its latest.

(cherry picked from commit 11dd425)

Co-authored-by: Trent Mick <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ChrsMark ChrsMark ChrsMark approved these changes

Assignees

@trentm trentm

Labels

backport-active-8 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 8.[0-9]+ branches backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches skip-changelog

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@trentm @ChrsMark @elasticmachine