Skip to content

Conversation

scottinet
Copy link
Contributor

5.0.0 (2017-05-24)

Compatibility

Kuzzle Proxy
1.0.0-RC10 1.0.0-RC10

Breaking changes

Bug fixes

  • [ #214 ] createIndex should only return response.result (ballinette)

New features

  • [ #219 ] Add scrollProfile & scrollUsers support (samniisan)
  • [ #209 ] Add Collection:documentExists & Document:exists methods (samniisan)
  • [ #208 ] Adds a new replaceUser method to Security (samniisan)

Enhancements


ballinette and others added 30 commits April 20, 2017 10:50
…internal components (Kuzzle as well as websocket network wrapper for now)
+ implement the same methods in browser mode
Adds a new replaceUser method to Security
 Harmonize event emitters implementation
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 24, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #220 into master will decrease coverage by 1.37%.
The diff coverage is 93.03%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.42%   98.04%   -1.38%     
==========================================
  Files          16       17       +1     
  Lines        1735     1843     +108     
  Branches      466      493      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits         1725     1807      +82     
- Misses         10       36      +26
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Collection.js 95.81% <100%> (-1.16%) ⬇️
src/Kuzzle.js 98.64% <100%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
src/networkWrapper/wrappers/websocket.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/security/Security.js 97.2% <84.61%> (-2.8%) ⬇️
src/Document.js 99.01% <90.9%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
src/eventEmitter/index.js 92.47% <92.47%> (ø)
src/security/User.js 98.41% <95.83%> (-1.59%) ⬇️
src/CollectionMapping.js 97.72% <0%> (-2.28%) ⬇️
... and 1 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 977d2d1...6be0bb0. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@stafyniaksacha stafyniaksacha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to check things about networkError handling before this release

Copy link
Contributor

@benoitvidis benoitvidis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't #221 be included too?

@scottinet
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benoitvidis > seems reasonable

@stafyniaksacha > can you provide me with more information about this issue? If you want I can process it to release this SDK faster.

@scottinet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this release proposal until the remaining needed pull requests are merged.

@scottinet scottinet closed this May 29, 2017
@scottinet scottinet deleted the 5.0.0-proposal branch May 29, 2017 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants