Skip to content

Conversation

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jul 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto bertinatto marked this pull request as draft July 27, 2023 11:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 27, 2023
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and mrunalp July 27, 2023 11:18
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jul 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test images

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: could not list commits in this pull request. Please try again with /validate-backports.

Get "http://ghproxy/repos/openshift/kubernetes/pulls/1647/commits?per_page=100": dial tcp 172.30.229.2:80: i/o timeout

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test unit

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test unit

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

bertinatto and others added 3 commits September 20, 2024 14:21
…stConsistentReadFallback when ResilientWatchCacheInitialization is off
…herDontAcceptRequestsStopped when ResilientWatchCacheInitialization is off
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test unit

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?
/test ?

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 27, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 27, 2024

@bertinatto: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test artifacts
  • /test configmap-scale
  • /test e2e-aws-crun-wasm
  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-crun
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-downgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-runc
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test images
  • /test integration
  • /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • /test perfscale-control-plane-6nodes
  • /test unit
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-commits

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-single-node
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder
  • /test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test k8s-e2e-aws
  • /test k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas
  • /test okd-scos-images

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-artifacts
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-crun-wasm
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-crun
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-downgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-runc
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-integration
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-master-verify-commits

In response to this:

/test ?
/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Oct 27, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 27, 2024

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/reopen

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/lifecycle frozen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Nov 28, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 28, 2024

@bertinatto: The lifecycle/frozen label cannot be applied to Pull Requests.

In response to this:

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/lifecycle frozen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 28, 2024

@bertinatto: Failed to re-open PR: state cannot be changed. The ocp-next branch was force-pushed or recreated.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.