Skip to content

Conversation

@johnnynunez
Copy link
Contributor

@johnnynunez johnnynunez commented Feb 26, 2025

This pull request includes updates to the requirements-common.txt file and modifications to the fallback_or_error function in the vllm/model_executor/guided_decoding/__init__.py file. The changes aim to update dependencies and streamline the guided decoding process.

Dependency updates:

Guided decoding improvements:

  • vllm/model_executor/guided_decoding/__init__.py: Removed the fallback logic for non-x86 CPUs and the check for CpuArchEnum.X86 in the fallback_or_error function, simplifying the code and removing unnecessary platform-specific handling.

@johnnynunez johnnynunez requested a review from mgoin as a code owner February 26, 2025 12:03
@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@shen-shanshan
Copy link
Contributor

@johnnynunez

Could you please update the xgrammar version in requirement to v0.1.14 ? Then I will colse my PR.

Find more details at here.

@johnnynunez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@johnnynunez

Could you please update the xgrammar version in requirement to v0.1.14 ? Then I will colse my PR.

Find more details at here.

Done

@johnnynunez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mgoin when will it be merged?

@robertgshaw2-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator

your pre-commit is failing

johnnynunez and others added 7 commits March 10, 2025 13:20
Signed-off-by: Johnny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johnny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johnny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Hoyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Zhao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roger Wang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jennifer Zhao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: johnnynunez <[email protected]>
@johnnynunez
Copy link
Contributor Author

your pre-commit is failing

done!

Copy link
Member

@russellb russellb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your PR appears to have a lot of extra unintended changes, perhaps from a bad merge / rebase.

russellb added a commit to russellb/vllm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2025
This update includes support for aarch64 among other fixes and improvements.

Closes vllm-project#11886
Closes vllm-project#13986

Implements part of vllm-project#13894

Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <[email protected]>
russellb added a commit to russellb/vllm that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
This update includes support for aarch64 among other fixes and improvements.

Closes vllm-project#11886
Closes vllm-project#13986

Implements part of vllm-project#13894

Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <[email protected]>
@aarnphm
Copy link
Collaborator

aarnphm commented Mar 16, 2025

This will be addressed by #14868

@aarnphm aarnphm closed this Mar 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants