-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.1k
[Bugfix][ROCm][Build] Fix build regression on ROCm #21393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a build regression on ROCm by correctly scoping a CUDA-specific quantization kernel and its corresponding PyTorch operator registration to only be included in CUDA builds. I've added one high-severity comment regarding a potential future build issue due to an unconditional function declaration in a header file that should also be made conditional to ensure long-term maintainability.
| "scale_ue8m0) -> ()"); | ||
| ops.impl("per_token_group_fp8_quant", torch::kCUDA, | ||
| &per_token_group_quant_fp8); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice bot!
yewentao256
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the fix!
| "scale_ue8m0) -> ()"); | ||
| ops.impl("per_token_group_fp8_quant", torch::kCUDA, | ||
| &per_token_group_quant_fp8); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice bot!
mgoin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for fixing this, apologies for the disruption
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: qizixi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: x22x22 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jinzhen Lin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul Pak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Diego-Castan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <[email protected]>
Moving CUDA specific file to the ifdef CUDA section
Fix regression from #21083